Zimmermann

EN 2322

Everyman and Freytag’s Pyramid

 

Gustav Freytag concluded that five act tragedies follow a specific structure.  If blindly followed, structuralist theories force patterns on literature, discarding variations.  They limit literature, forcing it into models that are static and prescriptive.  Nevertheless, such structures often provide a way of approaching parts of piece of literature, disassembling it for analysis.

 

Freytag’s Pyramid

 

 

 

Morality plays deliver sermons on a single moral issue in the form of a narrative, a drama; they are typically allegories—a narrative presenting abstractions in the form of characters and places.   In this sense, the plays were homiletic, serving as a form of religious instruction.  They gained popularity in the 14th century and remained so, until Puritans began banning dramas.

  • Humor in the play is developed through dramatic irony—the audience already knows and sees what Everyman fails to understand.  The humor makes the audience less resistant to the message of the play and engenders sympathy for the main character and his struggles.
  • Avarice is condemned.  His goods are hoarded; he is not criticized for spending money.

 

 

Everyman

Some scholars have argued that Everyman is an inverted or reversed tragedy. Track the events of the play to prove that the Freytag’s Pyramid is inverted in the play.